<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>  
 <rss version="2.0"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
 <channel>
    <title>Web 2.0 announcer feed for telegraph.co.uk</title>
    <link>http://telegraphcouk.web2announcer.com/</link>
    <description>Web 2.0 announcer top stories for telegraph.co.uk</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:39 GMT</pubDate><item>
	<title>British Newspaper Steals A Blogger&#039;s Post - Word for Word</title>
    <link>http://web2announcer.com/go/7315</link>
    <author>unknown@Netscape.com</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Stolen by feature contributor Melissa Whitworth, who is located at The Daily Telegraph’s New York bureau. As mere bloggers, should we just allow this type of stuff to continue within the hallowed halls of journalism? I just don’t understand how so-called professional writers think they can get away with this stuff.
	</content:encoded>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://web2announcer.com/go/7315</guid><category domain="http://do-no-evil.web2announcer.com/">Do No Evil</category><category domain="http://telegraphcouk.web2announcer.com/">telegraph.co.uk</category><category domain="http://melissa-whitworth.web2announcer.com/">Melissa Whitworth</category><category domain="http://copyright.web2announcer.com/">copyright</category><category domain="http://claire-zulkey.web2announcer.com/">Claire Zulkey</category><category domain="http://plagiarism.web2announcer.com/">plagiarism</category><category domain="http://news.web2announcer.com/">News</category></item></channel>
</rss>